ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Spatial Geometry Analysis of Roadside LiDAR for Improved Vehicle Clustering Accuracy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Roadside LiDAR is a key sensing technology for intelligent transportation systems (ITSs) due to its high-precision spatial information and reliable monitoring of traffic environments. However, extracting traffic information from LiDAR point cloud data remains challenging because measurements are produced through angular sampling, causing the spacing between adjacent points to depend on radius and beam distribution. This study proposes a geometry-aware framework that incorporates LiDAR sampling geometry into the neighborhood criterion used to determine point-to-point association. The formulation defines neighborhood tolerance as a function of radial distance and vertical angular separation, enabling clustering decisions that are consistent with the sensing mechanism. In addition, the approach integrates deployment constraints based on sensor mounting height and region-of-interest limits to maintain physically meaningful connectivity under roadside sensing conditions. A systematic calibration procedure is conducted to estimate the scaling factor and radial spacing parameters and evaluate the method using both controlled and real-world datasets. Experimental results reveal that the proposed approach improves clustering accuracy and stability by reducing false negatives in sparse regions while avoiding excessive cluster merging in dense areas. The method demonstrates robust performance across varying sensing conditions and achieves higher accuracy than baseline approaches without parameter retuning, while introducing negligible computational overhead.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.