ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Controlled Evaluation of Hybrid Multi-Face Recognition Pipelines for Real-Time Occluded Face Recognition on Edge Devices.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate recognition of partially occluded faces remains challenging in unconstrained and real-time environments, especially under masks, partial occlusions, pose variation, and illumination changes. This study presents a controlled comparison of three hybrid multi-face recognition pipelines for robust occluded face recognition. For fair evaluation, all pipelines use the same SCRFD face detector, preprocessing protocol, Linear SVM classifier, and 60% unknown rejection threshold, while varying only the feature extractor: ResNet29, ConvNeXt, and ResNet100 with ArcFace embeddings. To reduce data leakage, models are trained only on normal, non-occluded faces and tested on unseen partially occluded faces. Evaluation is performed on a custom dataset and the public Real-World Occluded Faces dataset, alongside three existing paper methods with publicly available code tested under the same experimental protocol. The SCRFD with ArcFace ResNet100 and Linear SVM pipeline achieved the best results compared to existing papers and our other pipelines, reaching 97.475% real-time accuracy for five faces and over 99% confusion-matrix-based accuracy on the custom dataset. On the ROF dataset, it also achieved closed-set accuracies of 98.66% for sunglasses and 97.92% for masks, with threshold-based accuracies of 96.35% for the sunglass test and 95.14% for the mask test. Furthermore, it obtained EER values below 0.007 and AUC values above 99%. In real-time testing, it achieved 29.25 FPS with 34.18 ms/frame latency on a GPU-enabled laptop and approximately 5 FPS with 273.4 ms/frame latency on a Raspberry Pi 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.