ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Wafer-Based Evaluation of the Effects of Center Frequency and F-Number on Lateral Resolution in Scanning Acoustic Microscopy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scanning acoustic microscopy is a useful non-destructive imaging technique for semiconductor inspection, providing acoustic contrast without physical sectioning. However, the selection of an ultrasound transducer for high-quality imaging is not determined by the operating center frequency alone. The focusing condition, represented by the F-number, also plays a critical role in determining the lateral resolution. In this study, the combined effects of the center frequency and F-number on lateral resolution were investigated using wafer-based test samples. Focused ultrasound transducers with different center frequencies were used to image a striped resolution target for quantitative lateral resolution analysis. In addition, a custom-fabricated silicon wafer containing void-mimicking patterns was also imaged for qualitative evaluation. The results show that a higher frequency does not necessarily guarantee better lateral resolution. In fact, a lower-frequency transducer with tighter focusing showed greater image quality compared to a higher-frequency transducer with a larger F-number. These findings indicate that both frequency and F-number should be jointly considered when selecting ultrasound transducers for semiconductor inspection. This wafer-based evaluation provides practical guidance for optimizing imaging conditions in scanning acoustic microscopy, according to target feature size and inspection requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.