ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Confidence-Guided Fusion for Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation in Endoscopy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate monocular depth estimation (MDE) is a foundational task in endoscopic surgery, critical for augmenting depth perception and aiding surgical navigation. While diffusion-based and discriminative depth estimators demonstrate complementary strengths, they also exhibit asymmetric errors: discriminative models yield precise geometric boundaries but struggle in homogeneous or saturated areas, whereas diffusion models recover fine textures at the cost of occasional structural incoherence. To systematically exploit this complementarity, we present CoDepth, a novel framework that leverages confidence-guided fusion to harmonize the outputs of these heterogeneous estimators. Its core components include a complementary map extractor that identifies structured disparity disagreements, a cross-attention module for context-aware feature integration, and a probabilistic confidence network that generates spatially adaptive fusion weights. Extensive evaluations on the SCARED dataset show that CoDepth achieves improved overall performance relative to strong single-model baselines, with the most consistent gains observed in Abs Rel and δ-based accuracy, while changes in some other error metrics are more modest. Furthermore, CoDepth exhibits encouraging cross-domain generalization. When a model trained on SCARED is directly evaluated on SERV-CT, Hamlyn, and C3VD without fine-tuning, it achieves competitive performance and improves several key metrics across datasets. The framework also demonstrates enhanced robustness against common synthetic corruptions like low-light conditions, Gaussian noise, and impulse noise, underscoring its practical utility in complex clinical settings. These results suggest that confidence-guided complementary fusion provides a practical integration-level paradigm for combining heterogeneous endoscopic depth estimators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.