ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Customer Baseline Credibility in Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Incentive-Based Demand Response.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incentive-based demand response is an important flexibility resource for power systems with high-renewable energy penetration. However, practical incentive allocation depends not only on flexible capacity and user response uncertainty, but also on the credibility of customer baseline load (CBL), which directly affects response measurement, verification, and incentive settlement. To address this issue, this paper proposes a constrained reinforcement learning method with customer baseline credibility for dynamic resource allocation in incentive-based demand response. Based on user-side load measurements and demand response event records, the proposed framework evaluates user resources using flexible capacity, response reliability, response cost, and CBL credibility. The CBL credibility score reflects the measurement quality of the delivered response and is used as a pre-event allocation factor. Users are then grouped into different resource levels, and a group-level reinforcement learning agent dynamically determines incentive multipliers and response task allocation ratios. To improve feasibility, an action correction module revises raw policy outputs under budget, price, response capacity, and CBL risk constraints before implementation. Case studies are conducted using public industrial demand response measurements and open electricity-system time-series data. The results show that the proposed CBL-CRL method reduces the normalized total operating cost to 0.897, reduces the response tracking error to 0.108, and lowers CBL risk exposure to 0.087 under the normal scenario. Relative to the No-DR reference, CBL-CRL reduces the normalized total operating cost by 10.3 percent. Compared with MAPPO, the strongest learning-based baseline, CBL-CRL reduces the response tracking error by 10.7 percent and the CBL risk exposure by 40.8 percent, while maintaining the same renewable accommodation rate of 0.970. Compared with rule-based and learning-based baselines, CBL-CRL achieves a better balance between operational performance, incentive efficiency, action feasibility, and baseline-related settlement reliability. The results demonstrate that CBL credibility should not only be used for post-event settlement, but can also serve as an effective pre-event resource allocation factor for measurement-driven demand response programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.