ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Eye-Tracking-Based Evaluation of Cognitive Style and Driving Task Effects on AR-HUD Navigation Interfaces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Presentation Form and Presentation Timing in AR-HUD Takeover Displays on Driver Visual Attention: An Eye-Tracking Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As augmented reality head-up display (AR-HUD) becomes increasingly integrated into intelligent vehicles, inappropriate interface designs may increase drivers' cognitive workload and delay hazard responses. This study investigates how cognitive style, driving task type, and AR-HUD navigation design jointly influence drivers' behavioral performance and visual attention. A total of 55 participants were recruited and screened using the Group Embedded Figures Test, with 38 drivers finally selected for a 2 × 4 × 2 driving-simulation experiment comparing world-fixed (WF) and screen-fixed (SF) interfaces across goal-directed and stimulus-driven tasks. Reaction times and eye-tracking indicators were analyzed using generalized linear models. Results show that stimulus-driven tasks significantly increased reaction times, with rear-vehicle scenarios producing the longest responses (mean = 1.420). During lane-change tasks, WF displays significantly reduced fixation duration (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.