Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451215›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Integrating Evaluation into Exoskeleton Systems: A Model-Based Approach.

Kathy S Min, Homayoon Kazerooni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathy S MinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Homayoon KazerooniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of wearable robotic systems remains a challenge, particularly in real-world environments where laboratory-based methods are impractical. Existing approaches rely on external instrumentation, such as surface electromyography (sEMG) or motion capture, which are difficult to deploy continuously and do not directly measure key internal metrics such as joint loading or spinal forces. This work introduces a new paradigm for exoskeleton evaluation in which biomechanical assessment is embedded directly within the device's sensing and computational architecture. We present the ExoMetrix system, a platform that integrates onboard sensing, real-time data acquisition, cloud-based processing, and user-facing analytics into a unified workflow for continuous evaluation of human-exoskeleton interaction. Sensor data from the device are streamed and processed using physics-based models. The resulting outputs are translated into estimates of internal biomechanical quantities, including joint torques, spinal compression and shear forces, and muscle loading. By enabling real-time feedback and longitudinal monitoring without external instrumentation, this approach transforms evaluation from an external, episodic process into an embedded and continuous capability, supporting safer and more scalable deployment of exoskeleton technologies.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyHumansMotion CaptureRoboticsbiomechanical loadingembedded systemsevaluation platformexoskeletonhuman–robot interactionoccupational safetyreal-time monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42451215
PMCPMC13364395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.