ReviewNutrients2026
Efficacy and Safety of Glutathione Supplementation in Type 2 Diabetes & Diabetes Complications.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glutathione (GSH), the most abundant intracellular antioxidant, plays a central role in maintaining redox homeostasis, regulating immune responses, and protecting cellular integrity. In chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), GSH deficiency is a consistent hallmark, contributing to oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and progressive organ damage. This review critically examines the efficacy and safety of GSH supplementation and precursor strategies, synthesizing evidence across mechanistic studies, clinical trials, and translational research. In T2DM, GSH augmentation has been linked to improved insulin sensitivity, reduced oxidative damage, and better microvascular outcomes, although findings remain preliminary and heterogeneous. Safety profiles across populations are highly favorable, with gastrointestinal discomfort being the most reported adverse effect and serious toxicities rare. Importantly, both acute and chronic studies reinforce the compatibility of GSH and its precursors with standard antiretroviral and antidiabetic therapies. Despite this encouraging data, significant research gaps remain. Standardization of biomarkers, dose-response mapping, and long-term outcomes are urgently needed to move from proof-of-concept to clinical trials. Future directions include integrating mechanistic endpoints such as mitochondrial function and multi-omic profiling, exploring targeted delivery systems, and embedding implementation science to ensure real-world feasibility and equity. Collectively, the emerging evidence supports GSH-centered strategies as promising adjuncts for oxidative stress-driven chronic disease. Rigorous, well-designed trials are now required to define their definitive role in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.