Trial reportNutrients2026
Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Gut Microbiota in Children with Autism: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pollutant Burden in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Mechanistic Convergence, Genetic Susceptibility, and Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDysbiosis of the gut microbiota is common in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Probiotics have the potential to improve outcomes in ASD by modulating the gut microbiota-brain axis.
methodsIn a pilot randomised trial, children (2 to 5 years) with confirmed ASD (DSM-5 criteria) received either a multi-strain probiotic (450 billion CFU twice daily for one month, followed by once daily for three months) or placebo supplementation. Faecal microbiota profiles were assessed using pre- and post-supplementation samples. The primary outcome involved changes in gut microbiota diversity. Secondary outcomes included faecal short-chain fatty acid levels and behavioural changes.
resultsDifficulties in recruitment and loss to follow-up for reasons including COVID-19 resulted in the enrolment of only 23 (probiotic: 9; placebo: 14) instead of the planned 40 children. There was no evidence of changes in the gut microbiota in probiotic-supplemented children. The common phyla were Bacillota_A (~50%), Bacteroidota (~18%) and Actinobacteriota (~10%). Alpha- and Beta-diversity showed no significant difference between pre- vs. post-supplementation samples. Bifodobacteriaceae increased significantly in the probiotic-supplemented group (
conclusionsThe increase in faecal Bifodobacteriaceae supports an evaluation of probiotics in ASD. Addressing the reasons for loss to follow-up is important when designing trials in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.