SynthesisNutrients2026
Strain-Specific Effects of Early-Life Probiotic Supplementation on Respiratory Infections in Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesProbiotic and synbiotic supplementation has been proposed as a preventive strategy against respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in early childhood, although evidence in infants and young children remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation administered during the first 24 months of life on respiratory infection outcomes.
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2015 and 30 September 2025. Eligible studies included infants and children aged ≤24 months receiving oral probiotics or synbiotics compared with placebo, no intervention, or standard care. The primary outcome was the incidence of at least one upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), while the secondary outcome was the incidence of any RTI. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach.
resultsNine randomized controlled trials were included. Probiotic or synbiotic supplementation did not significantly reduce the risk of URTI (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.47-1.95; I
conclusionsCurrent evidence does not support the routine use of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation for the prevention of respiratory infections in children aged ≤24 months. However, potential strain-specific benefits warrant further investigation in adequately powered randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.