Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451032›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Role of Insurance Mechanisms in Managing Zoonotic Risk Within the One Health Approach.

Ivanka Lazarova, Desislava Kehayova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ivanka LazarovaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-0336-0947
Desislava KehayovaDepartment of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, University Multiprofile Hospital Burgas, 8000 Burgas, Bulgaria.

Funding

Trakia University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoonotic diseases represent an increasing health, economic, and social risk in the context of intensified movement of people, animals, and goods, which creates conditions for their rapid spread and the emergence of pandemics. The One Health approach provides an integrated framework that brings together human, animal, and environmental health in order to enable more effective risk management. This study aims to examine the role of insurance and financial mechanisms in zoonotic risk management in the context of One Health. The review identifies four main categories of mechanisms relevant to zoonotic risk management: human health insurance, animal insurance and compensation schemes for livestock producers, public emergency financing mechanisms, and integrated risk-sharing models. The analysis shows that these mechanisms often operate within separate sectors, which may limit their effectiveness in managing complex health threats. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of zoonotic risk management depends not only on the availability of financial resources, but also on how these mechanisms are integrated across sectors. In this context, insurance mechanisms are considered tools for both cost compensation and risk management. They support prevention, early detection, and disease control. The need for their integration within the One Health framework is emphasized. It is also necessary to develop models that ensure a more equitable distribution of risk and financial sustainability for the population as a whole.

Indexed as

financial protectionhealthcare policyhealth insuranceintegrated healthcare systems

Identifiers

PMID42451032
PMCPMC13361668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.