Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42450977›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Tibial Spine Avulsion Injuries in Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review of Anatomy, Management Strategies, and Return-to-Sport Considerations.

Demah M Benfaris, Zyad A Aldosari, Abdulaziz S AlNahari, Mohannad W Awwad, Mohammed N Alhuqbani, Abdulaziz Z Alomar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Demah M BenfarisDepartment of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7317-4242
Zyad A AldosariDepartment of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-5869
Abdulaziz S AlNahariCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0008-4861-733X
Mohannad W AwwadCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4594-6591
Mohammed N AlhuqbaniDepartment of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2627-6270
Abdulaziz Z AlomarDepartment of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5948-8221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tibial spine avulsion injuries represent a distinct pattern of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in children and adolescents, reflecting the unique anatomical and biomechanical properties of the skeletally immature knee. Unlike midsubstance ACL ruptures, these injuries involve avulsion of the tibial insertion and pose specific diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Management strategies remain heterogeneous, particularly for partially displaced fractures, with variation in surgical indications, fixation techniques, and rehabilitation protocols. This narrative review provides a structured synthesis of current evidence on the anatomy, biomechanics, clinical presentation, and management of pediatric tibial spine avulsion injuries. Nonoperative and operative approaches are compared, with attention to fixation strategies, complications, physeal considerations, and rehabilitation principles. Return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes are examined, with available evidence suggesting that RTS rates may be comparable between operative and nonoperative management in selected patients, although interpretation is limited by heterogeneous and predominantly retrospective data. Early mobilization appears important for reducing arthrofibrosis risk, while rehabilitation should be individualized. RTS decision-making remains inconsistent, with commonly used criteria largely extrapolated from ACL reconstruction literature and lacking validation in pediatric populations. Multifactorial assessment incorporating functional testing and patient-reported outcomes is increasingly advocated, although evidence for psychological readiness remains limited. Overall, the current literature is characterized by methodological heterogeneity and limited comparative data, restricting definitive conclusions. This review provides a clinically oriented synthesis while highlighting key uncertainties and priorities for future research.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentarthroscopic fixationpediatric kneephyseal preservationrehabilitationreturn to sportskeletally immaturetibial eminence fractures

Identifiers

PMID42450977
PMCPMC13361917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.