ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Quantitative Ultrasonographic Assessment of Supraspinatus Insertion Tendon in Non-Lame Dogs (Thickness and Relative Echogenicity).
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The canine supraspinatus insertion tendon (SIT) is frequently involved in shoulder disorders; however, objective ultrasonographic reference data remain limited. This study aimed to describe the ultrasonographic appearance of the SIT in clinically non-lame dogs and to develop a reproducible protocol for the quantitative analysis of tendon thickness and relative echogenicity. Thirty-five clinically non-lame dogs (70 shoulders) underwent prospective B-mode ultrasonography. On ultrasonographic examination, the SIT appeared as a structure composed of two clearly differentiated regions: a proximal region, which was thinner and more hyperechoic, and a distal region, which was thicker, relatively more hypoechoic, and attached to the bone surface. These findings were consistent with previous descriptions of the SIT ultrasonographic appearance reported in the literature. Tendon thickness and mean echogenicity were evaluated in both regions. Mean echogenicity was quantified using region-of-interest analysis and pixel intensity histograms, with trapezius muscle echogenicity used for background normalisation. Paired statistical tests and Pearson correlation analyses were performed. No significant differences were identified between the left and right SIT measurements for either thickness or relative echogenicity (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.