Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42450800›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Batch-Level Average Market Weight Estimation and Interpretability Analysis for Pigs with Regional K-Means Clustering and AMFormer.

Yan Chen, Ruiwen Liu, Yanbin Liang, Hongxing Peng, Guangmin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan ChenCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Ruiwen LiuCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yanbin LiangWens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Xinxing, Yunfu 527400, China.
Hongxing PengCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1872-8855
Guangmin HuangCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern pig farming, batch-level weight estimation is important for optimizing feeding management and improving economic efficiency. Current vision-based weight estimation methods are often affected by acquisition conditions and mainly focus on individual pigs, making them less suitable for batch-level decision-making. To address this problem, this study focuses on concurrent estimation of batch-level final average market weight and explores the use of tabular production data for non-invasive body weight estimation in pig groups. Based on more than 35,000 production records from a modern pig farming enterprise, we propose RC-AMFormer. The method uses region-wise K-means clustering to characterize underlying farming heterogeneity, introduces cyclic month encoding and organizational hierarchy features, and adopts the arithmetic attention mechanism in AMFormer to model feature interactions. Among the ten comparison models, RC-AMFormer achieves an MAE of 2.64, an MSE of 11.77, and an R2 of 0.67 on the test set. Compared with XGBoost, it reduces MSE and MAE by 4.03% and 1.43%, respectively. SHAP analysis identifies important features associated with market weight. These results suggest that tabular production data provide a feasible basis for batch-level non-invasive body weight estimation and may also support similar production scenarios.

Indexed as

deep learningK-means clusteringpig weight estimationregression networktabular data

Identifiers

PMID42450800
PMCPMC13359492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.