Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42450784›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Designing and Conducting Motivational Interviewing Research in Veterinary Clinical Settings: A Practical Guide for Researchers.

M Carolyn Gates, Clare J Phythian, Eileen Britt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Carolyn GatesAkoVet Limited, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-1945
Clare J PhythianAkoVet Limited, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.
Eileen BrittSchool of Psychology, Speech, and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9530-9777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) is gaining traction in veterinary medicine as an evidence-based approach for engaging clients in conversations that strengthen their intrinsic motivation to change behaviours that affect the welfare of animals in their care. While MI has a substantial and well-established evidence base across human healthcare and related fields, the veterinary evidence base remains small and is currently limited by study design challenges, inconsistent fidelity measurement, and outcome measures that rarely extend beyond short-term changes in communication behaviour. Existing methodological guidance addresses treatment integrity and theoretical mechanisms but does not provide an integrated framework for designing robust studies across the range of questions relevant to veterinary practice. This paper addresses that gap by providing practical methodological guidance for researchers designing MI studies in veterinary clinical settings. A novel conceptual model of the MI implementation pathway, mapping the journey from practitioner awareness through training and delivery to client outcomes, is used to organise key research questions that need to be answered in veterinary contexts. Guidance is then provided on selecting appropriate study designs, measuring fidelity and outcomes, estimating sample size, and managing the practical and ethical challenges specific to veterinary clinical settings, alongside minimum reporting standards to support more rigorous and reproducible MI research.

Indexed as

behaviour changeclinical settingsfidelityimplementationmotivational interviewingoutcome measurementresearch methodologystudy designveterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID42450784
PMCPMC13359946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.