Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42450534›Full record

ArticleBiology2026

Topographical Anatomy of the Gluteal and Hamstring Muscles in the Albino Rat (

Bettina Pretterklieber, Michael L Pretterklieber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bettina PretterklieberDivision of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, A-8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8015-0740
Michael L PretterklieberDivision of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, A-8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2570-2730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn comparative anatomy, muscles of the gluteal and hamstring groups are categorized and described inconsistently between, but also within, different species. Due to insufficient information on the exact topography of the individual muscles and a lack of illustrations, it is partly difficult to compare the data provided. Particularly for the albino rat, there is only limited information available for these muscles. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the presence and morphology of the gluteal and hamstring muscles in the albino rat, and to compare them with other species, including humans.

methodsBoth hind limbs of 30 formalin-embalmed male albino rats were carefully dissected. The individual muscles were identified based on their position in relation to nerves and to each other. Therefore, previous descriptions of other species were considered.

resultsThe gluteus superficialis and tensor fasciae latae muscles formed always a continuous musculoaponeurotic plate. The femorococcygeus and gluteus accessorius muscles were constant structures. The gluteus medius, piriformis and gluteus profundus muscles could always be identified. Within the hamstring group, the two-headed semitendinosus, the one-headed biceps femoris, the semimembranosus, and the caudofemoralis muscles were always present.

conclusionsIn this study, a detailed description and dissection guide of the systematic anatomy and topography of the gluteal and hamstring muscles of the albino rat is provided for the first time. The outcomes are intended to help improve knowledge of the anatomy of these muscle groups and to serve as a basis for future studies using rats as an animal model.

Indexed as

albino ratcomparative anatomygluteal muscleshamstring musclesmusculoskeletal system

Identifiers

PMID42450534
PMCPMC13360235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.