ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effect of Using Fructooligosaccharide and Isomaltooligosaccharides in Cocoa-Hazelnut Spread as Sugar Substitute and Prebiotic on Estimated Glycemic Index and Quality Parameters.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sucrose plays a critical role in fat-continuous confectionery systems such as cocoa-hazelnut spreads by contributing to sweetness, texture, flow behavior, particle interactions, and overall sensory quality. In this study, sucrose was replaced with fructooligosaccharide (FOS) and isomaltooligosaccharide (IMO) at replacement levels of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% in cocoa-hazelnut spread formulations. The effects of these substitutions on physicochemical, textural, and rheological properties, particle size distribution, color parameters, estimated glycemic index (eGI), and sensory characteristics were investigated. Sucrose replacement significantly altered the structural and rheological properties of the spread matrix depending on both the type of oligosaccharide and the level of substitution. Formulations containing FOS exhibited more pronounced reductions in firmness and sensory acceptability at higher replacement levels. In contrast, IMO-containing formulations better preserved particle dispersion, viscoelastic stability, and overall sensory quality, particularly at low to moderate substitution levels. However, complete replacement of sucrose showed an adverse effect on taste and spreadability in both oligosaccharide systems. Both oligosaccharides contributed to a reduction in the eGI values. The eGI decreased from 50.71 to 39.90 in FOS-containing formulations and from 51.39 to 41.94 in IMO-containing formulations. These findings suggest that FOS is more effective in lowering the eGI, whereas IMO demonstrates greater potential for maintaining the technological and sensory quality of cocoa-hazelnut spreads when used as a partial sucrose replacer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.