ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Integrating Machine Learning and Expert Sensory Evaluation to Identify Key Drivers of Tomato Fruit Quality: A Multi-Model and Age-Stratified Analysis.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual biochemical indicators are insufficient for comprehensive tomato food flavor quality assessment, necessitating multi-parameter models of the core soluble taste matrix. We hypothesized that age stratification of trained sensory assessors would expose differential biochemical variable importance profiles in flavor quality prediction. Accordingly, this study aimed to: (1) construct and compare multiple regression models linking eight biochemical indicators to sensory scores, (2) identify key quality drivers via feature selection, and (3) examine whether age stratification alters the identified sensory drivers. Eight baseline taste indicators across 62 tomato cultivars were evaluated by 30 age-stratified trained sensory panelists (<40 and ≥40 years), using cross-validation to ensure model robustness against small-sample constraints. Partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and Boruta were applied. Random forest achieved the best performance (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.