ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Identification of Species-Specific Peptide Markers in Highly Processed Meat Products Using De Novo Sequencing.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Processed meat products represent a major challenge for proteomic species identification due to extensive thermal treatment and protein structural changes. In this study, species-specific peptides in pork, chicken, and bovine meat products were identified using a directed fragmentation-assisted de novo sequencing workflow that combines 4-formylbenzene-1,3-disulfonic acid (FBDA) peptide derivatization, dual-polarity data-independent mass spectrometry (DIA-MS), and Protein Acrobat de novo sequencing software. Comparative analysis of non-fractionated and strong cation exchange (SCX)-fractionated pork luncheon samples improved peptide and protein identification after fractionation, with 312 peptides and 115 protein groups detected exclusively in fractionated samples. Species-specific peptides were predominantly assigned to conserved muscle-related proteins, including myosin, troponin, and tropomyosin, while sequence variability enabled reliable species discrimination despite protein conservation across species. To evaluate applicability for food fraud detection, mixed meat samples containing 10% chicken in pork or bovine matrices were analyzed, reflecting potential economically motivated adulteration through substitution with lower-cost meat components. Several chicken-specific peptides remained detectable in both mixtures, demonstrating robustness of the FBDA-assisted peptide sequencing combined with SCX fractionation and DIA-MS for detection of adulteration in complex processed food matrices. These findings establish a mass spectrometry-driven orthogonal method to ELISA testing for fast, reliable and accurate metaproteome analysis of highly processed food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.