ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
miR-29a and miR-15b Modulate SARS-CoV-2 Beta and Omicron Infection in Human Lung Epithelial Cells.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Host microRNAs (miRNAs) are widely proposed as innate antiviral effectors against SARS-CoV-2, yet whether they actually restrict infection in lung epithelial cells remains unresolved. Two of the most-cited candidates, miR-29a-3p and miR-15b-5p, are predicted to bind both the viral genome and key entry/trafficking factors such as Furin and ATG9A, but functional evidence is fragmented and often contradictory. Here, we put both miRNAs to the test in human Calu-3 cells infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Beta and Omicron BA.1 variants, using parallel gain- and loss-of-function strategies coupled to RT-qPCR of viral and cellular transcripts and back-titration of infectious progeny on VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells. Both miRNAs transiently suppressed viral gene expression at 6 hpi, but this early dampening was followed by a marked transcript rebound at 24 hpi, especially for Omicron, with virtually no impact on total extracellular viral RNA. More strikingly, miR-15b modulation enhanced infectious virus output during Beta infection, and miR-29a overexpression boosted Omicron BA.1 infectivity, while Furin, ATG9A, AKT3, and TFEB showed only modest, condition-dependent shifts. Rather than acting as clean antiviral effectors, miR-29a and miR-15b emerge as context-dependent modulators that can paradoxically favor SARS-CoV-2 replication-a cautionary signal for miRNA-based antiviral strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.