ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Machine Learning for Colitis-Associated Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evidence and Future Directions Toward Precision Medicine, a Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colitis-associated cancer (CAC) represents a major long-term complication in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), the two main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Unlike sporadic colorectal cancer, CAC develops through a distinct inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence driven by chronic inflammation and complex molecular alterations. Early detection of dysplasia and accurate risk stratification remain critical challenges in IBD management. Conventional surveillance strategies, including endoscopy, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry, are time-consuming, operator-dependent, and may fail to identify early neoplastic changes. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), has emerged as a promising approach to improve lesion detection, molecular characterization, and predictive risk modeling. Early studies, though limited, suggest that AI-based approaches may enhance the identification of dysplasia and CAC, improve risk prediction, and support personalized surveillance strategies. Furthermore, the integration of multimodal data, including clinical, endoscopic, histological, and molecular features, may further improve predictive performance and enable precision medicine approaches in IBD. This review summarizes current evidence on AI and ML applications for CAC detection and risk prediction in IBD, discusses technical and clinical challenges, and highlights future directions for integrating AI into routine clinical practice to improve surveillance and clinical outcomes in patients with IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.