ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Statistical Methods for Detecting Nonlinear Relationships in Gene Expression and Omics Data: A Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput technologies such as RNA-seq and single-cell transcriptomics generate increasingly large and high-dimensional gene expression datasets in which nonlinear dependence structures are common. Because classical methods primarily capture linear associations, they may fail to characterize many biologically relevant patterns of dependence. To address this limitation, diverse nonlinear dependence measures-including information-theoretic, rank-based, kernel-based, distance-based, copula-based, and clustering-based approaches-have been developed. However, the field remains fragmented, and comparative evaluations are often inconsistent. This review organizes nonlinear methods into major methodological families and critically compares their statistical behavior, strengths, limitations, and characteristic modes of failure. We emphasize that method selection depends on matching inferential objectives to estimator assumptions, analytical constraints, and characteristic failure modes. By identifying recurring trade-offs among flexibility, robustness, interpretability, and computational scalability, we provide scenario-based guidance for method selection in transcriptomics, network inference, and functional genomics. In doing so, we aim to align inferential objectives with analytical requirements, supporting principled and application-specific use of nonlinear dependence methods in modern omics research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.