ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Radiocapitellar Alignment in Suspected Pediatric Monteggia Lesions: Narrative Review and Imaging Interpretation Framework.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations may be overlooked when ulnar injury is incomplete or plastically deformed and radiocapitellar malalignment is subtle. Radiographic interpretation is further complicated by incomplete ossification, non-standard projection, and the limitations of applying a single alignment line across all ages and imaging scenarios. This narrative review synthesizes clinically relevant evidence on radiocapitellar alignment assessment in suspected pediatric Monteggia lesions and proposes an imaging interpretation framework for radiographs and problem-solving imaging. The review integrates developmental anatomy, radiographic adequacy, radiocapitellar line behavior, forearm-based P-line assessment, lateral humeral line assessment, ulnar bow sign, and targeted second-line imaging with ultrasound, MRI, and arthrography. The framework emphasizes three practical steps: first determining whether the available images are adequate for line-based assessment; then selecting the line or sign according to age, ossification stage, projection, and available landmarks; and finally reporting discordant or limited studies as equivocal rather than forcing a binary normal/abnormal interpretation. We also summarize diagnostic error considerations, structured reporting elements, and future directions for AI-assisted measurement and uncertainty-aware interpretation. The proposed framework is intended to support consistent radiologic reasoning and communication among emergency physicians, radiologists, and pediatric orthopedic surgeons. It is not a validated diagnostic rule, and prospective observer-performance studies are needed before implementation as a clinical pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.