ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quality of Life in Sarcoidosis.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterised by a heterogeneous clinical presentation and variable disease course. Despite low mortality, the burden of sarcoidosis extends beyond organ involvement, with many patients reporting significant impairment in quality of life (QoL). Fatigue, chronic cough, and small fibre neuropathy (SFN) are among the most prevalent and debilitating symptoms reported by patients, often demonstrating poor correlation with conventional markers of disease activity and frequently persisting despite apparent disease control. This review examines the impact of sarcoidosis on QoL and highlights the limitations of traditional assessment tools, including imaging and pulmonary function testing, in capturing the full extent of disease burden. The role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is discussed, including generic instruments and sarcoidosis-specific tools such as the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ), Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire (SHQ), and Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool (SAT), alongside symptom-specific measures targeting fatigue, neuropathic symptoms, and cough. Current and emerging management strategies aimed at improving QoL are reviewed, including immunosuppressive therapies, biologic agents, and non-pharmacological interventions. Despite increasing recognition of QoL as a key outcome, its integration into clinical trials remains inconsistent. Incorporating PROMs into routine clinical practice and research is essential to enable comprehensive assessment and support patient-centred care. Greater emphasis on QoL outcomes may improve therapeutic decision-making and overall disease management in sarcoidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.