ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Circulating Tumor DNA in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Translating Molecular Discovery into Clinical Surveillance.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic tumor predisposition syndrome characterized by a substantial risk of developing peripheral nerve sheath tumors, including malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), which occur in 8-13% of patients. Approximately 50% arise from plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) and 40% develop de novo, making them a major cause of premature mortality. Current clinical management is limited by the intrinsic shortcomings of standard imaging modalities: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and tissue biopsy in distinguishing benign PNs from early malignant transformation, which remains a major clinical challenge. This progression follows a stepwise molecular continuum marked by cumulative genetic alterations and widespread epigenetic dysregulation. In this setting, liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising non-invasive approach to help fill these diagnostic gaps by enabling real-time molecular monitoring through the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and other blood-based biomarkers. This review examines the current evidence supporting liquid biopsy applications in NF1 management, including early detection of MPNST, discrimination between benign and malignant lesions, mutational profiling for therapeutic targeting, and disease monitoring before and during treatment. We also discuss the current evidence on fragmentomics, methylomics and driver mutation profiling as tools to distinguish PNs from MPNSTs. Recent evidence suggests that liquid biopsy may help detect molecular changes associated with malignant transformation before clear clinical signs emerge, potentially opening an important window for intervention and supporting a shift towards a more molecularly informed surveillance model. Finally, this review considers the possible extension of liquid biopsy to other tumor types, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.