Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449763›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Rise and Fall of Interventional Pulmonology Procedures: Lessons in Innovation, Evidence, and Abandonment.

Jean Reinoso, Prince Ntiamoah, Avantika Nathani, Atul C Mehta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean ReinosoDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3362-2699
Prince NtiamoahDivision of Interventional Pulmonology, Aurora BayCare Medical Center, Green Bay, WI 54311, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4991-843X
Avantika NathaniDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Atul C MehtaIntegrated Hospital Care Institute, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional pulmonology has produced numerous bronchoscopic and pleural procedures that were widely adopted but later declined or abandoned. This review examines selected techniques across diagnostic and therapeutic domains, focusing on their clinical Confirmed performance and reasons for attrition. Common drivers of decline include limited incremental benefit, high operator dependence, technological complexity, and competition from more effective alternatives. In several cases, early observational success was not sustained in randomized or real-world settings. Understanding why procedures fail is essential to guide the development, evaluation, and adoption of future technologies in interventional pulmonology.

Indexed as

bronchoscopyinnovationinterventional pulmonology

Identifiers

PMID42449763
PMCPMC13360320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.