ReviewCancers2026
Metabolic and Molecular Mechanisms of Gemcitabine Resistance in Urothelial Carcinoma.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy has long served as a standard treatment for urothelial carcinoma (UC), particularly in perioperative and metastatic settings. However, therapeutic efficacy is frequently limited by intrinsic or acquired resistance. Gemcitabine functions as a prodrug whose activity depends on coordinated processes involving cellular uptake, intracellular activation, metabolic inactivation, and nucleotide metabolism. Increasing evidence suggests that resistance in UC is mediated by multiple interconnected mechanisms beyond alterations in gemcitabine transport, activation, and inactivation alone. Key molecular determinants include human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), cytidine deaminase (CDA), and ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 (RRM1), which is involved in nucleotide pool maintenance and DNA synthesis. In addition, replication stress responses, apoptosis evasion pathways, and tumor microenvironment-associated factors also contribute to gemcitabine resistance. Stress-adaptive pathways involving Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1), hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α), and autophagy-related mechanisms may further promote survival under chemotherapy-induced stress conditions. In addition, extracellular mucin-associated mechanisms may alter intratumoral drug accessibility and contribute to resistance. In this review, we summarize UC-specific evidence regarding gemcitabine resistance and discuss how these pathways collectively shape an integrated resistant phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.