ReviewCancers2026
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and CIPN: State-of-the-Art Evidence and a Microbiota-Ozone Therapeutic Framework.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects up to 85% of patients receiving neurotoxic regimens, often leading to dose reduction and impaired quality of life, yet effective preventive or therapeutic options remain scarce. Emerging evidence implicates chemotherapy-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis in CIPN pathogenesis via a gut-nerve axis. Concurrently, rectal ozone insufflation (ROI) has been shown to modulate the gut microbiota and reduce inflammation in preclinical models. This article critically examines the evidence on the role of gut dysbiosis in CIPN, evaluates the microbiota-modulating capacity of rectal ozone therapy (OT), and assesses the biological plausibility of ozone as a microbiota-targeting intervention for CIPN, while explicitly distinguishing between established evidence and hypothetical mechanisms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Neurotoxic agents induce dysbiosis marked by reduced microbial diversity, loss of short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria, and expansion of pro-inflammatory taxa. Preclinical models demonstrate a causal role for specific microbial communities in CIPN, with microbiota depletion or fecal transplantation modulating neuropathic phenotypes. In human cohorts, dysbiosis severity correlates with CIPN symptoms. Preclinical studies show that ROI restores microbial balance, enhances short-chain fatty acid levels, and strengthens intestinal barrier function via Nrf2/HO-1 and SIRT1 pathways. Preliminary retrospective data from small case series (
conclusionsConvergent preclinical evidence supports a biological rationale for investigating ROI as a microbiota-targeting intervention in CIPN. However, this rationale remains largely hypothetical in the clinical setting. High-quality randomized controlled trials with longitudinal microbiome profiling are urgently needed to establish mechanistic causality and to determine whether the promising preclinical findings translate into clinically meaningful benefits. Until such evidence is available, the framework presented here should be regarded as hypothesis-generating rather than as a basis for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.