Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449638›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

PSMA PET in Lymph Node Staging of Prostate Cancer: From Diagnostic Accuracy to Clinical Decision-Making.

Francesco Esperto, Arianna Pischetola, Matteo Bauckneht, Jacopo Passoni, Antonio Testa, Stefania Ferretti, Stefano Puliatti, Sebastiano Buti, Roberto Mario Scarpa, Davide Campobasso and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco EspertoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0108-1864
Arianna PischetolaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8313-6619
Matteo BaucknehtNuclear Medicine, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-9116
Jacopo PassoniNuclear Medicine, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-5381-2668
Antonio TestaDepartment of Urology, San Camillo De Lellis Hospital, ASL of Rieti, 02100 Rome, Italy.
Stefania FerrettiUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2292-5632
Stefano PuliattiUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1597-9595
Sebastiano ButiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0876-0226
Roberto Mario ScarpaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2577-6310
Davide CampobassoDepartment of Urology, San Camillo De Lellis Hospital, ASL of Rieti, 02100 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2072-114X
Rocco PapaliaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9566-7243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node involvement in prostate cancer has major prognostic and therapeutic implications, yet conventional imaging based on size and morphology remains limited in detecting small-volume metastatic disease. Although extended pelvic lymph node dissection is considered the reference standard for nodal staging, it is invasive, associated with morbidity, and primarily diagnostic in intent. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) has reshaped staging by enabling molecular detection of nodal metastases, consistently demonstrating superior accuracy compared with conventional imaging. This narrative review critically evaluates the role of PSMA PET in lymph node staging, with a primary focus on primary diagnosis and selected considerations on biochemical recurrence, focusing not only on diagnostic accuracy but on clinical utility and decision-making. PSMA PET shows high specificity but moderate sensitivity for pelvic nodal metastases, with reduced performance for micrometastatic disease; therefore, a negative scan cannot reliably exclude nodal involvement in high-risk patients. Evidence indicates frequent stage migration and management changes, including refinement of surgical planning, radiotherapy target delineation, and treatment intensification strategies. However, most pivotal therapeutic trials were based on conventional imaging, and long-term outcome data validating PSMA PET-guided treatment adaptations remain limited. We discuss biological rationale, radiotracer characteristics, interpretation frameworks, guideline perspectives, real-world variability in adoption, and current limitations, including false-positive findings, PSMA heterogeneity, and lack of universal standardization. Rather than replacing established staging paradigms, PSMA PET should be integrated within a comprehensive, risk-adapted framework. Ongoing prospective trials will clarify whether molecularly defined nodal staging translates into improved oncologic outcomes and will determine its definitive role in contemporary prostate cancer management.

Indexed as

lymph node stagingprostate cancerPSMA PET

Identifiers

PMID42449638
PMCPMC13359636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.