ReviewCancers2026
Patient and Technology Selection for Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal therapy is emerging as an organ-preserving strategy for selected patients with localized prostate cancer, aiming to preserve urinary and sexual function while maintaining acceptable cancer control. However, patient and technology selection remain complex because prostate cancer is often multifocal, clinically significant lesions may be missed by imaging or biopsy, and long-term comparative oncological data are limited. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and consensus recommendations on oncological suitability, histopathological risk features, tumor burden, imaging assessment, anatomical considerations, functional priorities, and follow-up. We also discuss the complementary roles of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography, micro-ultrasound, and artificial intelligence-assisted planning. Finally, we review how tumor location and proximity to critical structures guide selection among high-intensity focused ultrasound, cryotherapy, irreversible electroporation, transurethral ultrasound ablation, laser ablation, and photodynamic therapy. Focal therapy remains promising but requires careful selection, shared decision-making, and structured follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.