ReviewCancers2026
Prostate Cancer Treatment: Cryoablation in Context.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in men worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) is the subject of much study across various treatment approaches and medical specialties. Currently, 5-year survival rates exceed 90%, and research efforts have increasingly shifted towards approaches that improve quality of life, minimizing the likelihood and severity of morbidities associated with treatment. Focal cryoablation is an approach that has been steadily gaining traction in recent years, both for its reduced risk of morbidity and greater potential for salvage therapy, relative to standard treatment. The goal of this work is to discuss the safety and efficacy of focal cryoablation for prostate cancers and define it in context among other treatment approaches. Publications describing approaches to, results from, and the science behind PCa cryoablation were reviewed and collated, describing the current landscape. Additional comparisons were made against analogous approaches, including radiation, surgical resection, hormone therapy, and other ablation modalities. Currently available literature characterizes prostate cryoablation as an effective and well-tolerated approach for treating primary and recurrent PCa, although the data are limited by heterogeneous evidence, lack of standardized endpoints, and an absence of robust randomized comparisons. Cryoablation for prostate cancer continues to evolve, offering a minimally invasive treatment option for both primary and salvage prostate cancer patients, although additional long-term studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.