ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2026
Diabetes mellitus and the risk of postoperative visual and auditory hallucinations after cardiac surgery: insights from the VAACS study.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPostoperative hallucinations are underrecognized neuropsychiatric complications of cardiac surgery. Glycemic control may influence their occurrence, particularly in patients with diabetes. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of visual and auditory hallucinations in diabetic and non-diabetic patients after cardiac surgery, and to identify factors independently associated with hallucinations within each group.
methodsIn this prospective multicenter cohort, hallucinations were assessed daily for 7 days using the Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences. Cox regression identified predictors within diabetic and non-diabetic cohorts.
resultsVisual hallucinations occurred in 12.0% of diabetic and 11.2% of non-diabetic patients, while auditory hallucinations occurred in 7.9% and 6.0%, respectively, with no statistically significant between-group difference. Among diabetic patients, elevated preoperative HbA1c independently predicted both visual hallucinations (adjusted HR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.59) and auditory hallucinations (adjusted HR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.76). Higher preoperative blood glucose was also independently associated with increased risk of visual hallucinations (adjusted HR 1.011; 95% CI, 1.002-1.020) and auditory hallucinations (adjusted HR 1.013; 95% CI, 1.003-1.024). Morphine use showed an inverse association with auditory hallucinations in diabetic patients, although this did not reach statistical significance after adjustment (adjusted HR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.29-1.12). Longer postoperative mechanical ventilation was inversely associated with auditory hallucinations in diabetic patients (adjusted HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91), although this finding should be interpreted cautiously because hallucination assessment began only after extubation. Among non-diabetic patients, hemodialysis dependence independently predicted visual hallucinations (adjusted HR 6.99; 95% CI, 1.59-30.61), while critical preoperative state (adjusted HR 2.70; 95% CI, 1.23-5.93) and higher EuroSCORE II (adjusted HR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) independently predicted auditory hallucinations.
conclusionHallucinations affect a notable prportion of patients after cardiac surgery. Higher preoperative HbA1c and blood glucose were associated with postoperative hallucination risk, particularly in diabetic patients. These findings identify dysglycemia as a clinically relevant risk marker, but do not establish that short-term glycemic optimization would directly prevent hallucinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42449454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.