ReviewBMC chemistry2026
Recovery of bioactive compounds from citrus by-products: advances in conventional and innovative extraction approaches, bioavailability, and applications.
Review in BMC chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citrus processing generates large amounts of by-products-mainly peels, pomace, and seeds-that are abundant in valuable bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, carotenoids, essential oils, pectin, and vitamin C. Efficient recovery of these compounds not only supports the production of functional ingredients but also aligns with circular economy and zero-waste objectives. Traditional extraction methods, including maceration, Soxhlet extraction, hydrodistillation, and solvent extraction, remain widely used but often require long processing times, consume significant energy and solvents, and can degrade heat-sensitive molecules. In recent years, greener and more innovative technologies-such as ultrasound-assisted, microwave-assisted, enzyme-assisted, supercritical fluid, pressurized liquid, pulsed electric fields, and deep eutectic solvent extractions-have emerged as sustainable alternatives, achieving higher yields and better compound stability with lower environmental impact. This review provides a critical comparison of conventional and emerging extraction methods, evaluating their efficiency, selectivity, scalability, and environmental performance. It also explores how these techniques influence the bioavailability and bioaccessibility of extracted compounds. Furthermore, potential applications of citrus by-product extracts in the food, nutraceutical, cosmetic, and agricultural sectors are discussed. Finally, the review addresses key technological, economic, and regulatory challenges related to industrial implementation and highlights future opportunities for integrating these extraction strategies into circular bioeconomy models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.