Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449429›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2026

TrLPMO9A drives oxidative cellulose depolymerization in Trichoderma reesei and is enhanced by heterologous cellobiose dehydrogenase expression.

Priscila Thihara Rodrigues, César Rafael Fanchini Terrasan, Nathalia Rodrigues Bulka, Evandro Antonio de Lima, Jose Alberto Diogo, Renan Yuji Miyamoto, Felipe Jun Fuzita, Joaquim Martins Junior, Lucia Daniela Wolf, Adriano Freitas Lima and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Priscila Thihara Rodrigues *Brazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
César Rafael Fanchini Terrasan *Brazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nathalia Rodrigues BulkaBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Evandro Antonio de LimaBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jose Alberto DiogoBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renan Yuji MiyamotoBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Jun FuzitaBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Joaquim Martins JuniorBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucia Daniela WolfBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriano Freitas LimaBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Douglas Alvaredo PaixãoBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Meiski Maria VedovattoBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lara de Oliveira ArinelliEquinor Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
William GodoyEquinor Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gabriela Felix PersinotiBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda MandelliBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. fernanda.mandelli@lnbr.cnpem.br.
Mario Tyago MurakamiBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. mario.murakami@lnbr.cnpem.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303898/2024-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 21/04891-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the most prominent mechanisms for plant cell wall deconstruction in nature, and widely employed in industry, relies on the coordinated action of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes. However, how redox networks sustain synergistic biomass deconstruction remains incompletely understood, particularly in the industrial workhorse Trichoderma reesei. This fungus lacks a cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH), a pivotal redox partner for lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in many fungal systems. Here, we investigated the oxidative machinery of T. reesei and the contribution of key redox-active enzymes to lignocellulose deconstruction.

resultsWe demonstrate that the oxidative capacity of the T. reesei secretome is largely driven by a single enzyme, TrLPMO9A, the most abundant oxidoreductase in the secretome. Proteomic analyses also revealed a lower abundance of other redox-active enzymes, including TrLPMO9B and AA5 oxidase. Although deletion of TrLPMO9B and TrAA5 had a less pronounced impact on saccharification efficiency compared with TrLPMO9A, the secretome remodeling triggered by their deletion, along with the associated decrease in saccharification performance, indicates that these redox enzymes play distinct, non-redundant roles. They likely play a system-level role within a cooperative redox network that fuels oxidative cellulose deconstruction, potentially extending beyond direct catalysis to processes associated with redox balance or protein secretion. Finally, we challenged the CDH-lacking paradigm by heterologously expressing a CDH in T. reesei. In vivo reconstitution of this redox duet increased biomass saccharification by 13-19%, demonstrating a strong synergistic relationship between LPMOs and CDHs even in a native CDH-lacking host.

conclusionThese findings define the core oxidative machinery underlying biomass deconstruction in T. reesei, revealing the major cellulose-oxidative role of TrLPMO9A and the importance of a cooperative redox network for efficient lignocellulose depolymerization. Moreover, successful reconstitution of CDH activity in a naturally CDH-deficient host establishes redox engineering as a promising strategy to enhance industrial biomass conversion.

Indexed as

Biomass conversionCellobiose dehydrogenasesLytic polysaccharide monooxygenasesRedox systemTrichoderma reesei

Identifiers

PMID42449429
PMCPMC13647598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.