ReviewBiology of sex differences2026
Vaginal microbiomes and their pertinent social context: a microbial ecological review proffering AMR-STI acquisition and emergence.
Review in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the landscape of sexual health, sex, gender, and sexuality are inextricably linked and highly relevant to sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Globally, key sexual and reproductive health concerns of women have been associated with the socioeconomic status of their country, indicating that social context bears influence over sexual health outcomes. Further, the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistant STIs (AMR-STIs) in the sexual networks of gay and bisexual men-who-have-sex-with-men (GBMSM) suggests an implicit connection between microbiological and social phenomena, although research to date is relatively limited and often fails to reflect the complexity and nuance of sexual networks. Vulval and vaginal microbiome composition may influence STI acquisition and transmission, yet the relationships between composition, microenvironment, and STIs remain largely overlooked, especially in the context of women and gender-diverse people. In this article, we explore the possibility that a combination of social, sexual, and behavioural factors, combined with biological features, shape the microbiological context of STIs within the vaginal microenvironment. MAIN: The human vaginal microbiome (VMB) forms an ecological niche home to a complex ecosystem of microorganisms. The microbial composition of the VMB is diverse between individuals, with variations observed across racial and ethnic groups, and intrapersonal fluctuations linked to a plethora of factors both within and outside of personal control. Importantly, VMB health is a crucial component of wellbeing for people assigned female at birth (AFAB), transgendered women with neovaginas, and their sexual partners. Clinical context also remains important; in Australia, doxycycline prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) has recently become available to GBMSM networks aimed to protect against the acquisition of STIs. However, Doxy-PEP guidelines exclude AFAB people and fail to specify regarding use among gender diverse individuals. Given the high prevalence of AMR-STIs within GBMSM networks, the impact of this intervention on excluded partners should be thoroughly investigated. Factors in the VMB such as biofilm formation and necessary microbial balance with opportunistic pathogens renders this ecological microbial niche a hypothetically perfect platform for AMR development and emergence within the social context.
conclusionThis review explores the social context of vaginal microbiomes, their potential influence on AMR-STI development, and highlight several important knowledge gaps to benefit from further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.