ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Three-order interactions in the alpha band of default mode network EEGs based on O-information rate: insights from aging and Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlpha-band default mode network (DMN) connectivity declines with aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet most electroencephalography (EEG) connectivity studies used pairwise (two-order) measures, such as mutual information rate (MIR). We leveraged O-information rate (OIR) to quantify three-order interactions and to separate redundant from synergistic information processing across frontal, temporal, and parietal DMN regions. We hypothesized that, extending established findings of reduced pairwise connectivity, (i) OIR (and its components) would be reduced in older versus younger adults and in AD versus healthy controls (HC); (ii) combining MIR with OIR would improve classification compared with MIR alone; and (iii) OIR measures would correlate positively with global cognition (as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)).
methodsResting-state EEG from two samples-healthy adult lifespan aging (95 younger; 93 older) and AD spectrum (44 HC; 84 amnestic mild cognitive impairment [aMCI]; 41 AD)-was source-localized using eLORETA to DMN regions. Alpha band (8-13 Hz) MIR and OIR were computed through multivariate spectral analysis. Group differences were tested using t-tests or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with multiple comparison correction. Classification (OIR, MIR, demographic, and combined feature sets) used cross-validated logistic-regression, linear-SVM, and random-forest models, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and DeLong tests for AUC comparisons.
resultsOIR and its redundancy component were significantly reduced in older versus younger adults and in AD versus HC/aMCI, with no HC-aMCI differences. The synergy component showed no group differences. MIR decreased broadly with aging and fronto-parietally in AD. Regarding classification (AD spectrum dataset, cross-validated AUC), OIR-based metrics outperformed MIR (AD vs. HC: 0.93 vs. 0.73; AD vs. aMCI: 0.93 vs. 0.71; aMCI vs. HC: 0.48 vs. 0.46). Combining demographics with all information-theoretic features improved AD vs. HC (0.98; DeLong p = 0.023) but not AD vs. aMCI (0.93), where OIR alone was already at ceiling; no feature set exceeded chance for aMCI vs. HC. After correction, OIR and its redundancy component correlated positively with MoCA scores; MIR and the synergy component did not.
conclusionsAlpha-band three-order DMN interactions-particularly redundant information processing-decline with aging and AD and provide additional information beyond two-order connectivity for diagnostic classification. OIR offers complementary measures to traditional metrics, and future studies should examine its value when combined with more established AD biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.