Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449403›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026

Severe hyperoxia during VA-ECMO promotes oxidative stress and multi-organ injury in an experimental rat model of septic cardiomyopathy.

Tianlong Wang, Mingru Zhang, Jing Wang, Han Zhang, Jieru Zhang, Jiayu Zou, Jian Wang, Yuan Teng, Gang Liu, Shujie Yan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tianlong WangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Mingru ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Han ZhangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Jieru ZhangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Jiayu ZouDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Yuan TengDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Shujie YanDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China.
Bingyang JiDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10010, China. jibingyang@fuwai.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1410-6901

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2025-GSP-GG-9Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 2025-BZJ17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere hyperoxia during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in observational studies. However, causal evidence and optimal oxygen targets remain uncertain. Hyperoxia may exacerbate oxidative stress and organ injury, particularly in the presence of systemic inflammation and ischemic shock. This study aimed to investigate the dose-dependent effects of membrane lung sweep oxygen fraction (FsO₂) during the early phase of VA-ECMO on systemic oxidative stress and early multi-organ injury markers, and to explore the mechanistic role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) using a rat VA-ECMO model.

methodsIn this randomized experimental study, Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into normal rats and rats with cardiogenic shock induced by septic cardiomyopathy using LPS. Graded membrane FsO

resultsGraded FsO₂ levels produced distinct and stable differences in arterial PaO₂ and SaO₂ during VA-ECMO support. In both normal and shock rats, severe hyperoxia (FsO₂ = 90%) caused greater systemic oxidative stress, metabolic acidosis and structural injury in the lung, liver, and kidney than normoxia (FsO₂ = 30%) or moderate hyperoxia (FsO₂ = 60%). In contrast, myocardial injury was not significantly modified by FsO₂ gradients. In animals without shock, these hyperoxia-associated changes were relatively mild and largely attenuated after VA-ECMO withdrawal, whereas shock markedly increased susceptibility to severe hyperoxia-induced early multi-organ injury. Notably, moderate hyperoxia (FsO₂ = 60%) was not associated with clearly worse oxidative stress or organ damage than normoxia (FsO₂ = 30%) in either normal or shock animals. Tempol administration attenuated oxidative stress and mitigated histological injury, and diminished differences among FsO₂ groups.

conclusionsIn this early-phase rat model of septic cardiomyopathy requiring VA-ECMO support, severe hyperoxia (FsO CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHyperoxiaMultiple Organ FailureOxidative StressSepsisAnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReactive Oxygen SpeciesBiomarkersReactive Oxygen SpeciesHyperoxiaOxidative stressRatReactive oxygen speciesSeptic cardiomyopathyVenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID42449403
PMCPMC13386755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.