ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Real-world safety and implementation challenges of lecanemab therapy for Alzheimer's disease in South Korea: a single-center experience.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLecanemab, an amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibody, was recently approved for early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in South Korea. Asians were underrepresented in prior trials, and real-world data from Korea remain scarce, particularly regarding treatment settings, adverse events, and barriers to scalability. We assessed the feasibility and safety of lecanemab among Korean patients in a real-world tertiary hospital.
methodsA total of 112 patients initiated lecanemab treatment between December 2024 and October 2025 at Asan Medical Center. Prevalence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), treatment discontinuation, and factors limiting implementation were evaluated.
resultsAmong 112 patients (mean age 71 years; 59% female), IRRs occurred in 41 (37%) and were generally mild or moderate under active surveillance. Among 105 at-risk patients who received at least four infusions and had at least one monitoring MRI, ARIA developed in 20 (19%): ARIA-E/H in 6 (5.7%) and isolated ARIA-H in 14 (13.3%). Only 1 patient with isolated ARIA-H presented with transient confusion. Patients with ARIA-E/H were younger, whereas those with ARIA-H were older and more likely to have baseline microhemorrhages. Eleven out of 105 were APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes, of whom 5 developed ARIA. The rapid increase in treatment demand exceeded outpatient infusion capacity, resulting in progressively longer waiting times-up to 20 weeks 9 months after program initiation.
conclusionThis single-center experience from a tertiary referral hospital in Korea demonstrates that lecanemab treatment was feasible and generally well-tolerated, with manageable adverse events including ARIA and IRRs; however, limited infusion capacity, lack of reimbursement, and patient concentration in tertiary centers highlight the need for referral networks and system-level strategies to improve nationwide accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42449395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.