ArticleBMC medical education2026
Microlearning in medical histology: a longitudinal evaluation of faculty-created five-minute videos using five theoretical frameworks and Kirkpatrick assessment.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical histology education worldwide faces a documented crisis: curriculum compression has dramatically reduced laboratory instructional time while content expectations remain unchanged. Microlearning, in the form of faculty-created five-minute histology review videos, offers a pragmatic and evidence-based contribution, but empirical evidence for its value in tissue identification remains limited. This study provides rigorous longitudinal evidence across three Kirkpatrick levels to address this gap.
methodsThis longitudinal study followed first-year medical students across three time points within one semester at Alfaisal University, Saudi Arabia. Performance was assessed using a mock-OSPE on blood vessel histology. Students had access to 11 faculty-created five-minute histology review videos covering cardiovascular and renal histology. Four hypotheses were tested across Kirkpatrick levels 1-3, guided by five theoretical frameworks: Cognitive Load Theory, Multimedia Learning Theory, Variation Theory, Spaced Repetition Theory, and Self-Regulated Learning Theory. Two hypotheses addressed Kirkpatrick Level 3 behavior. Two frameworks - Variation Theory and Self-Regulated Learning Theory - were applied to histology video education for the first time, to the best of the author's knowledge.
resultsMock-OSPE scores were significantly higher in the post-intervention assessment, with a large effect size. The majority of students watched the videos multiple times across both organ systems. Positive perceptions remained consistently high across all three time points, while negative perceptions remained low overall. Faculty-created videos exhibited a 17-fold adoption increase, becoming students' primary out-of-class learning method. Students valued both videos and face-to-face microscopy, consistent with Generation Z's blended learning profile.
conclusionsFaculty-created five-minute histology review videos are an effective and reproducible microlearning component of a broader strategy to mitigate the effects of curriculum compression. They extended learning beyond limited laboratory hours through 24/7 access, were associated with higher tissue identification scores, and showed high voluntary adoption - complementing rather than replacing hands-on learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.