ArticleBMC oral health2026
A soft tissue-sparing positioning guide for the DCIA flap in mandibular reconstruction: a pilot study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrecise placement of bone grafts is critical for functional and aesthetic outcomes in mandibular reconstruction. Conventional positioning guides typically require extensive stripping of periosteum and surrounding soft tissues, which may increase surgical trauma. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and preliminary clinical performance of a novel soft tissue-sparing positioning guide for mandibular reconstruction.
methodsThis single-arm case series feasibility study included five female patients with segmental mandibular defects. Preoperative computed tomography data were used for virtual surgical planning and fabrication of patient-specific osteotomy and positioning guides using three-dimensional printing. The novel positioning guide featured an arched structural design that maintained a predefined clearance from the bone graft surface, allowing accommodation of periosteum and muscles while ensuring standardized and accurate fixation. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using serial imaging and three-dimensional deviation analysis of six bilateral mandibular anatomical landmarks.
resultsAll patients completed the surgical protocol without flap loss or severe complications. Minor postoperative morbidity was limited to transient donor-site edema, and no permanent sensory deficits, local recurrence, or metastasis were observed during follow-up. Intraoperative findings confirmed effective preservation of soft tissues around the bone graft, except at the precision fixation part. Quantitative three-dimensional analysis demonstrated satisfactory postoperative mandibular alignment across all evaluated landmarks.
conclusionsThe proposed soft tissue-sparing positioning guide appears to be a feasible adjunct for mandibular reconstruction based on the findings of this preliminary study, but given that this is a small, uncontrolled feasibility case series, further validation in larger controlled studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.