Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449267›Full record

ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting live birth outcomes in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Shasha Luo, Dejing Wang

Abstract readValidation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shasha LuoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, 563000, China.
Dejing WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, 563000, China. 2430085462@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfertility affects millions of people worldwide, imposing substantial psychological, economic, and social burdens on patients. Although frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is increasingly used, the live birth rate remains approximately 40%, highlighting the urgent need for improved predictive tools to enhance clinical outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting live birth outcomes in patients undergoing FET.

methodsPatients who underwent FET cycles at the Department of Reproductive Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, from January 2021 to December 2023 were included as a retrospective cohort, while those treated from January 2024 to December 2024 formed a prospective validation cohort. The retrospective cohort was randomly divided into training and testing sets at a 7:3 ratio for model development and internal validation. Feature selection was performed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. Based on the selected predictors, three predictive models were constructed: Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Calibration curves and Brier scores were used to assess model calibration, while decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to evaluate clinical utility. The optimal model was selected, and the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the predictions.

resultsA total of 4,937 subjects were included. The retrospective development cohort comprised 3,470 cases, and the prospective external validation cohort comprised 1,467 cases. The live birth rate was 41.21% in the development cohort and 46.01% in the external validation cohort. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression identified ten key features for model development. The AUCs for the LR, RF, and XGBoost models on the training set were 0.826, 0.881, and 0.854, respectively; on the test set, they were 0.818, 0.828, and 0.843, respectively; and on the external validation set, they were 0.798, 0.796, and 0.809, respectively. Considering performance across all datasets, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best predictive performance. ROC curves showed that the predicted probabilities of the XGBoost model were generally consistent with actual outcomes, and the calibration curves were close to the diagonal, indicating good predictive calibration. DCA confirmed the clinical utility of the XGBoost model, showing high net benefit across most clinical decision thresholds. SHAP analysis identified the number of FET cycles, number of blastocysts transferred, number of high-quality embryos transferred, AMH, E2 level on the day of hCG administration, embryo type at transfer, age, endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration, duration of infertility, and history of intrauterine adhesions as key predictive factors for live birth in patients undergoing FET.

conclusionThe XGBoost-based model shows good predictive performance for live birth following FET. SHAP analysis provides interpretability of key features, which can support the development of targeted clinical interventions to improve pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing FET.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferLive BirthMachine LearningAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCryopreservationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyProspective StudiesRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesFrozen-thawed embryo transferLive birthMachine learningPredictive modelSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID42449267
PMCPMC13647881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.