ArticleBMC cancer2026
Development and internal validation of a dynamic Prealbumin-Immune-Inflammation-NLR Prognostic Score (PINPS) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors improve survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), yet many patients derive limited benefit, and identifying those at high risk of poor outcomes remains challenging. Most immune-nutritional composite scores use only pre-treatment data and have rarely been applied to on-treatment risk monitoring. We developed and internally validated the Prealbumin-Immune-Inflammation-Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Prognostic Score (PINPS) and explored a four-quadrant dynamic framework integrating baseline risk with early post-treatment change.
methodsThis single-centre retrospective study enrolled 549 consecutive ESCC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between 2019 and 2026. After excluding 24 with incomplete follow-up, 525 were analysed for overall survival (OS). After multiple imputation (m = 20), 12 candidate markers and indices were screened using LASSO-penalised Cox regression with bootstrap internal validation. As a post hoc extension, patients were cross-classified by baseline PINPS risk (high/low) and change in the earliest post-treatment value obtained between days 21 and 90 (decrease/non-decrease). Cytokine correlations (n = 325) and exploratory TBNK immunophenotyping (n = 239) were assessed in available subsets.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 10.7 months, 150 deaths occurred. PINPS retained three routine blood-based components: prealbumin, pan-immune-inflammation value, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Its bootstrap-corrected C-index was 0.667 (95% CI 0.615-0.719), improving by 0.145 over clinical variables alone (P < 0.0001). Although continuous ΔPINPS magnitude was not associated with survival (P = 0.864), the four-quadrant framework discriminated OS in landmark analysis (P = 0.0032). Median survival was 18.3 versus 36.8 months in the persistent-high-risk versus baseline-low/decreasing-PINPS groups. Among baseline high-risk patients, 37.7% were reclassified as low risk during treatment. IL-6 was the only cytokine correlated with both baseline PINPS and early PINPS change (all FDR < 0.05), while exploratory TBNK analysis suggested T-cell polarisation.
conclusionsPINPS provides clinically interpretable survival stratification for ESCC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Its post hoc four-quadrant framework identified a persistent-high-risk subgroup with the worst prognosis and suggested on-treatment risk reclassification in over one-third of baseline high-risk patients. External validation is required before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.