ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Integrating MRI radiomics and deep learning for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a multicenter study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDevelop a multimodal fusion model combining MRI radiomics and deep learning (DL) to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
methodsPatients with locally advanced breast cancer from two centers (Center 1: 404 training, Center 2: 174 testing) were enrolled. Pretreatment MRI radiomic features and DL-derived features were extracted, selected via Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, and integrated with clinical risk factors into a joint multimodal fusion model using XGBoost. The model was validated internally on an independent test cohort and externally on the Duke Breast Imaging Dataset (284 patients) to assess generalizability across diverse populations and imaging protocols.
resultsThe fusion model achieved AUCs of 0.935 (training), 0.916 (testing), and 0.83 (external validation), surpassing standalone radiomics and DL models. External validation confirmed robustness to institutional variability, with strong calibration and clinical utility.
conclusionThe XGBoost-integrated radiomics-DL-clinical model accurately predicts pCR, validated across independent cohorts, and may optimize personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.