ArticleBMC neurology2026
The effect of community intervention based on deep learning-established early screening system and model construction for stroke.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke is a common cardiovascular complication. The machine learning (ML) algorithms in stroke is a new and noble approach. The objective of the study is to study the practicability of establishing a community-based stroke risk exploratory feature identification using ML and evaluate the effectiveness of individualized interventions in preventing stroke.
methodsRetrospective data was retrieved of stroke patients (n = 158) and healthy population (n = 358) who underwent physical examinations in the community. Random forest and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were chosen as feature variables. To create a model for predicting the risk of stroke, the multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Then, a prospective study was conducted with 72 high-risk individuals and divided randomly. Research group received tailored interventions and conventional interventions, while the control group received routine interventions.
resultsTriglycerides, apolipoprotein B (apoB), serum creatinine, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and homocysteine were determined as risk factors for stroke by the exploratory feature identification. The prospective study revealed no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of stroke in research group was 5.41%, remarkably lower than the control group (28.6%, P>0.05). The time to stroke occurrence was significantly longer in research group than in control group (P>0.05).
conclusionThe community-based stroke risk exploratory feature identification established using ML can effectively screen high-risk populations. Individualized intervention measures can reduce the incidence of stroke significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.