Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449237›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2026

Scale-up evaluation results of a multi-level approach using mailed immunochemical test (FIT) and patient navigation to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in rural clinic settings.

Jessica J Currier, Jennifer Coury, Emily Myers, Erin S Kenzie, Amanda F Petrik, Brittany Badicke, Margaret McLain McDonnell, Maryan Carbuccia Abbott, Gloria D Coronado, Melinda M Davis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04890054 (Screening More Patients for CRC Through Adapting and Refining Targeted Evidence-Based Interventions in Rural Settings), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04890054 nacompletednot on this map

Screening More Patients for CRC Through Adapting and Refining Targeted Evidence-Based Interventions in Rural Settings (SMARTER CRC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOHSU Knight Cancer InstituteRan2021 to 2024Enrolled5,696ConditionsColorectal CarcinomaArmsFecal Immunochemical Test, Interview, Patient Navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica J CurrierKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America. currijes@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-7912
Jennifer CouryOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Emily MyersOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Erin S KenzieOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Amanda F PetrikKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, United States of America.
Brittany BadickeOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Margaret McLain McDonnellOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Maryan Carbuccia AbbottOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Gloria D Coronado *Cancer Center, University of Arizona, 1200 E University Blvd, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States of America.
Melinda M Davis *Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.

Funding

Smarter CRC Supplement for ACCSIS Patient NavigationUH3CA244298 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2020 to 2023
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA244298NCI NIH HHS UH3CA244298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening effectively reduces CRC mortality and morbidity, yet screening rates remain below US national targets in rural and low-resourcedd settings. An effective intervention to improve screening is mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) combined with patient navigation. However, these multicomponent interventions have been unevenly adopted across health systems and organizations, and studies of how to spread effective system-level approaches are limited.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of a multi-component scale-up approach designed to increase CRC screening rates in rural, low-resourced primary care clinics, based on findings from the SMARTER CRC pragmatic trial. The approach included five scale-up activities: (1) an Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) tele-mentoring program; (2) patient navigation training; (3) webinars on process design and communication strategies; (4) technical assistance; and (5) dissemination of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach for Rural Populations Facilitation Guide. We measured engagement in scale-up activities, adoption of mailed FIT and patient navigation outreach, and modifications to organizations' CRC screening programs.

resultsA total of 47 participants from 25 organizations participated in scale-up activities. Participants were most commonly from clinical practices (28%), hospital-based systems (24%), and community organizations (20%). All organizations participated in the ECHO series (100%, n = 25), and some also engaged in additional scale-up activities. Most organizations (84%, n = 21) reported having a CRC screening program at baseline. Engagement in ECHO and other scale-up activities influenced adoption and modification of CRC screening patient outreach strategies for most organizations (69%, n = 17). Participation led to modifications in existing programs.

conclusionParticipation in multifaceted scale-up activities increased organizational knowledge and engagement in CRC screening patient outreach within rural, low-resourced clinic settings. These activities also supported the refinement of existing CRC screening programs through the adoption and modification of outreach strategies. These findings can inform future efforts to optimize scale-up approaches for CRC screening and other complex interventions in rural, low-resourced healthcare settings.

trial registrationRegistered at clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI's Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP # NCI202101032) on May 11, 2021.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningOccult BloodPatient NavigationRural Health ServicesAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostal ServicePrimary Health CareRural PopulationColorectal cancer screeningImplementation scienceMailed fecal immunochemical testingMultilevel interventionPatient navigationRural healthScaling-up interventions

Identifiers

PMID42449237
PMCPMC13656510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.