Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449190›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2026

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Obeticholic Acid in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Final Results of the POISE Long-Term Safety Extension.

Christopher L Bowlus, Frederik Nevens, Kris V Kowdley, Alan Bonder, Thomas Capozza, Jing Li, Radhika Nair, Michael Trauner, David E Jones

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01473524 (A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial and Long-Term Safety Extension of Obeticholic Acid in Patients With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01473524 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial and Long-Term Safety Extension of Obeticholic Acid in Patients With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIntercept PharmaceuticalsRan2012 to 2018Enrolled217ConditionsPrimary Biliary CirrhosisArmsObeticholic Acid (OCA), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher L BowlusDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3906-6811
Frederik NevensDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kris V KowdleyLiver Institute Northwest and Elon S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alan BonderDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6821-0416
Thomas CapozzaIntercept Pharmaceuticals Inc., Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
Jing LiIntercept Pharmaceuticals Inc., Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
Radhika NairIntercept Pharmaceuticals Inc., Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
Michael TraunerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David E JonesTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Funding

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Alfasigma S.p.A.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObeticholic acid (OCA) has been evaluated in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the 12-month, double-blind, phase 3 POISE trial. A 3-year interim analysis of the open-label extension (OLE) demonstrated a favourable safety profile with sustained improvements in liver biochemistries.

aimTo present the final long-term safety and efficacy data from the 5-year POISE OLE.

methodsAll patients who entered the OLE (N = 193) were started on OCA 5 mg daily for a minimum of 3 months, after which the dose could be increased. Safety and efficacy were evaluated in the overall OLE population. Additional analyses censored data points following OCA titration > 10 mg to align with the prescribing label.

resultsPOISE was terminated after it was determined that the OLE had achieved its study objectives of sustained efficacy with no unexpected safety findings. With censoring of data points following OCA titration to > 10 mg, the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was pruritus (70%); serious hepatic-related TEAEs were reported in five patients (3%). The serious hepatic-related TEAEs and deaths (n = 2, 1%) were assessed by the Investigators as unrelated to OCA. Liver biochemistries improved throughout the OLE; the response rate for the POISE primary endpoint was 63% at Month 72. Liver stiffness, as measured by transient elastography, was stable over the study duration.

conclusionsFindings from the POISE OLE support the safety and efficacy profile of long-term OCA treatment for patients with PBC with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA (NCT01473524).

trial registrationPhase 3 study of obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (POISE) ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01473524.

Indexed as

Chenodeoxycholic AcidCholagogues and CholereticsLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUrsodeoxycholic AcidChenodeoxycholic AcidCholagogues and Cholereticsobeticholic acidUrsodeoxycholic Acidalkaline phosphatasefibrosis stabilisationliver diseaseopen‐label extensionsafety‐related outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42449190
PMCPMC13603960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.