ArticleScientific reports2026
Network architecture determines delay robustness in the spindle assembly checkpoint.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis by preventing premature activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Despite its critical role in maintaining genomic stability, most mathematical models of the SAC treat underlying biochemical processes as instantaneous, neglecting experimentally observed delays arising from molecular activation, complex assembly, and intracellular transport. How such temporal structure interacts with network architecture to shape checkpoint dynamics remains unclear. Here, we develop a distributed-delay framework and incorporate experimentally motivated delays into multiple mechanistic SAC architectures. Using a gamma-chain formulation, we perform systematic stability and bifurcation analyses across representative models. We find that biologically realistic delays fundamentally reorganize system dynamics, partitioning SAC architectures into two distinct classes: delay-robust designs that preserve strong APC/C inhibition, and delay-sensitive designs in which checkpoint control collapses. Motivated by this classification, we introduce a bistable template architecture that combines mechanistic Mad2 templating with an autocatalytic feedback loop. This design maintains bistability and high inhibition across a broad range of physiological delays and remains resilient under stochastic perturbations. These results identify network architecture as a key determinant of robustness to molecular timing and demonstrate that distributed delays can stabilize, rather than destabilize, checkpoint function by enabling temporal integration and memory-like behavior. More broadly, this work establishes delay-aware design principles for biochemical decision-making systems in which intermediate processes are intrinsically time-distributed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.