ArticleNature communications2026
Distinct molecular subgroups in pediatric and young-onset meningiomas require age-adapted risk stratification.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas in pediatric and adolescent/young adult patients are poorly characterized biologically and clinically, and risk stratification is largely extrapolated from adult tumors. We analyze 293 tumors from patients aged 0-39 years using integrated histopathological and molecular profiling. Youth-onset meningiomas are enriched for NF2 and SMARCE1 alterations and exhibit a gain-dominated copy-number landscape, including recurrent chr17q gain, whereas canonical adult high-risk features, such as chr1p loss, lack prognostic significance. Adult-derived prognostic frameworks, including WHO grade, methylation-based stratification and integrated risk scores, fail to predict progression in patients ≤21 years of age. Tumors segregate into age-enriched epigenetic clusters defined by SMARCE1, NF2 and BAP1 alterations. Among NF2-altered tumors, patterns of Merlin inactivation, shaped by germline status and co-occurring copy-number variations, delineate biologically divergent subsets. In patients ≤21 years, extent of resection is the dominant predictor of outcome, while molecular features further refine risk assessment. These findings define pediatric and young adult meningiomas as a distinct molecular entity and support age-adapted risk refinement that integrates molecular features with strong clinical determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.