ArticleObesity surgery2026
Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients Undergoing Metabolic Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere obstructive sleep apnea (SOSA) is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications in patients undergoing metabolic bariatric surgery. However, polysomnography-based screening remains limited by poor accessibility and high cost. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model for predicting SOSA in patients with obesity undergoing metabolic bariatric surgery.
methodsA total of 1,690 participants from the Chinese Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Database were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). Feature selection was performed using correlation analysis, collinearity analysis, and five feature-selection algorithms and overlapping variables were retained. Eight ML algorithms were developed and evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsAmong the 1,690 patients, 549 (32.5%) were diagnosed with SOSA. Of the eight ML algorithms, the random forest model demonstrated the best predictive performance using nine key variables: neck circumference, body mass index, age, observed apnea, hematocrit, gamma-glutamyl transferase, sex, creatinine, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The model achieved an AUC of 0.931 in the training set and 0.869 in the validation set. The final model was implemented as an easy-to-use online tool.
conclusionsThe explainable random forest model demonstrated excellent predictive performance and clinical applicability for identifying SOSA in patients undergoing metabolic bariatric surgery. This model may facilitate perioperative risk stratification, targeted monitoring, and individualized clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS: • The prevalence of SOSA was 32.5% in this large Chinese multicenter bariatric cohort, highlighting the urgent need for efficient preoperative screening in this high-risk population. • The random forest model incorporating nine readily available clinical variables achieved excellent predictive performance with an AUC of 0.869 in the validation cohort. • The model is deployed as a free online calculator, enabling individualized SOSA risk assessment, targeted PSG referral, and cost-effective perioperative risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42449080What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.