ArticleJournal of community health2026
Community Health Workers' Roles and Challenges in Wisconsin: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community health workers (CHWs) play a critical role in addressing social determinants of health and bridging gaps between communities and healthcare systems, yet limited research has examined how CHWs perceive their roles, integration within healthcare systems, and implementation challenges within specific state-level contexts. We conducted a sequential mixed-methods study consisting of an anonymous statewide online survey of CHWs in Wisconsin followed by two virtual focus group discussions. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using team-based inductive thematic analysis. Forty CHWs completed the survey, most of whom were female (98%) and worked in community-based or nonprofit settings. Participants commonly provided advocacy, health education, referrals to services, and navigation of social needs, with focus on chronic disease, mental and behavioral health. Although 84% rated their impact on patient outcomes as high to very high, 74% reported low to neutral levels of professional recognition. Major challenges included lack of funding, limited professional recognition, and inadequate resources. Five qualitative themes emerged: multifaceted CHW roles, bridging healthcare systems and communities, persistent structural barriers, navigating professional identity and recognition, and sustaining commitment amid limited institutional support. Despite high perceived impact, CHWs in Wisconsin experience limited recognition, funding instability, and inconsistent integration into healthcare systems. Addressing these barriers through professional pathways and sustainable financing mechanisms is essential to strengthening CHW workforce integration and long-term system impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42449075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.